123
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: Jennylujiao

[活动公告] 【新SAT考试每日一练】精选题目+答案解析--阅读(2016/4/11)

[复制链接]
发表于 2016-4-11 09:49 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
SAT Question of  the Day
2016/4/11
{:6_150:}

This passage is adapted from a speech delivered by Congresswoman Barbara Jordan of Texas on July 25, 1974, as a member of the Judiciary Committee of the United States House of Representatives. In the passage, Jordan discusses how and when a United States president may be impeached, or charged with serious offenses, while in office. Jordan’s speech was delivered in the context of impeachment hearings against then president Richard M. Nixon.

Today, I am an inquisitor. An hyperbole would not be fictional and would not overstate the solemnness that I feel right now. My faith in the Constitution is whole; it is Line complete; it is total. And I am not going to sit here and be 5 an idle spectator to the diminution, the subversion, the destruction, of the Constitution. “Who can so properly be the inquisitors for the nation as the representatives of the nation themselves?” “The subjects of its jurisdiction are those offenses which 10 proceed from the misconduct of public men.”* And that’s what we’re talking about. In other words, [the jurisdiction comes] from the abuse or violation of some public trust. It is wrong, I suggest, it is a misreading of the Constitution for any member here to assert that for a 15 member to vote for an article of impeachment means that that member must be convinced that the President should be removed from office. The Constitution doesn’t say that. The powers relating to impeachment are an essential check in the hands of the body of the legislature against 20 and upon the encroachments of the executive. The division between the two branches of the legislature, the House and the Senate, assigning to the one the right to accuse and to the other the right to judge—the framers of this Constitution were very astute. They did not make the 25 accusers and the judges . . . the same person. We know the nature of impeachment. We’ve been talking about it a while now. It is chiefly designed for the President and his high ministers to somehow be called into account. It is designed to “bridle” the executive if he 30 engages in excesses. “It is designed as a method of national inquest into the conduct of public men.”* The framers confided in the Congress the power, if need be, to remove the President in order to strike a delicate balance between a President swollen with power and grown 35 tyrannical, and preservation of the independence of the executive. The nature of impeachment: a narrowly channeled exception to the separation of powers maxim. The Federal Convention of 1787 said that. It limited impeachment to 40 high crimes and misdemeanors, and discounted and opposed the term “maladministration.” “It is to be used only for great misdemeanors,” so it was said in the North Carolina ratification convention. And in the Virginia ratification convention: “We do not trust our liberty to a 45 particular branch. We need one branch to check the other.” . . . The North Carolina ratification convention: “No one need be afraid that officers who commit oppression will pass with immunity.” “Prosecutions impeachments 50 will seldom fail to agitate the passions of the whole community,” said Hamilton in the Federalist Papers, number 65. “We divide into parties more or less friendly or inimical to the accused.”* I do not mean political parties in that sense. 55 The drawing of political lines goes to the motivation behind impeachment; but impeachment must proceed within the confines of the constitutional term “high crimeand misdemeanors.” Of the impeachment process, it was Woodrow Wilson who said that “Nothing 60 short of the grossest offenses against the plain law of the land will suffice to give them speed and effectiveness. Indignation so great as to overgrow party interest may secure a conviction; but nothing else can.” Common sense would be revolted if we engaged 65 upon this process for petty reasons. Congress has a lot to do: appropriations, tax reform, health insurance, campaign finance reform, housing, environmental protection, energy sufficiency, mass transportation. Pettiness cannot be allowed to stand in the face of such 70 overwhelming problems. So today we’re not being petty. We’re trying to be big, because the task we have before us is a big one.
* Jordan quotes from Federalist No. 65, an essay by Alexander Hamilton, published in 1788, on the powers of the United States Senate, including the power to decide cases of impeachment against a president of the United States.

The main rhetorical effect of the series of three phrases in lines 5-6(“the diminution, the subversion, the destruction”) is to
(A) convey with increasing intensity the seriousness of the threat Jordan sees to the Constitution.
(B) clarify that Jordan believes the Constitution was first weakened, then sabotaged, then broken.
(C) indicate that Jordan thinks the Constitution is prone to failure in three distinct ways.
(D) propose a three-part agenda for rescuing the Constitution from the current crisis.

答案和解析:
游客,如果您要查看本帖隐藏内容请回复

{:5_116:}本帖回复你的答案即可,凡是参与答题的小伙伴们都可以得到2枚留学备考金币哦!同时第二天会公布答案解析哦!!!


sat考试每日一练汇总帖:http://bbs.liuxuebeikao.com/thread-306136-1-1.html
回复

使用道具 举报

热门推荐

2016年3月SAT考试真题北美考区-高清无水印版
2016年3月SAT考试真题北美
《2016-2018年SAT最全真题集》共含25套SAT真题,本套为:2016年3月SAT北美卷。各位考
2016年4月SAT考试加州真题免费高清无水印版下载!
2016年4月SAT考试加州真题
《2016-2018年SAT最全真题集》共含25套SAT真题本资料为:2016年4月加州真题各位考生可
新SAT2017年1月亚太真题|&答案&解析
新SAT2017年1月亚太真题|
本次考试让大家没有想到的是部分考题重复了 2016 年 6 月的北美卷。因此,此次考试的
托福TPO模考软件听力词汇汇总pdf下载
托福TPO模考软件听力词汇
TPO是备考托福的神器 掌握TPO词汇也是托福学习的重中之重 这里为大家整理了TPO听力生
新GRE阅读理解36套精心整理资源放出!GRE阅读提分最强资料!
新GRE阅读理解36套精心整
回复"GRE阅读"即可看到下面的下载链接,赶紧来下! **** 本内容被作者隐藏 ****
2016年10月亚太SAT考试官方真题及参考答案(完整版)
2016年10月亚太SAT考试官
2016年10月亚太SAT考试官方真题及参考答案(完整版) 回复:SAT真题资料 即可下载****
2018托福真题回忆下载(1-3月)
2018托福真题回忆下载(1-
对于托福考生来说,在托福考试备考冲刺阶段, 托福听力真题回忆能够帮助托福考生更好
©2001-2018  留学备考  Powered by©Discuz! | 站点统计  
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表